Why Are Vaccinated's Heart Chambers Micro-Scarred...
A recent Japanese study highlights multiple micro-scars in the heart chambers of COVID-vaccine-boosted deceased. Another Vindication of Bolus Theory.
Tribute to Japanese and Korean doctors and researchers for their contribution.
I want to recognize and congratulate the many Japanese and Korean doctors and scientists who have provided the world with insightful, professional, and honest research these past five years, probably more so than any other nations. My work and my discoveries build on the work of many others, have benefitted tremendously from the work of these courageous scientists. During COVID, most scientists were too scared or too biased to provide the world with factual and unbiased data. Those of you who have read “The Needle’s Secret” can testify about the many Japanese studies I quote in the book. This recognition doesn’t absolve the Japanese Health Authorities. But, it shows during this period of darkness, many tried to shine light…
If you don't know "Bolus Theory" - Here's a brief Summary
At the injection site, the needle cuts through vascularized tissue, breaching venules, arterioles, or capillaries. The injected fluid, under pressure from the syringe and the muscle’s sealed nature, escapes into these lower-pressure vessels rather than staying confined for slow lymphatic uptake. This forms the bolus—a high-density swarm of LNPs, initially stabilized by polyethylene glycol (PEG) coatings that prevent immediate aggregation or transfection.
The bolus enters the venous bloodstream and flows toward the right side of the heart. Carried by the superior vena cava, it reaches the right atrium and ventricle within seconds. Here, the PEG coating begins eroding due to blood components and shear forces, activating the LNPs for transfection. Some endothelial cells in the venous walls may already start uptake, expressing spike protein if it’s an mRNA vaccine.
Next, the bolus is pumped into the pulmonary arteries and lungs. This dense capillary network—designed for gas exchange—exposes the bolus to a massive endothelial surface. PEG erosion accelerates, and "activated" LNPs transfect lung endothelial cells, triggering localized immune attack. The bolus, now slightly diluted but still concentrated, exits via the pulmonary veins.
It then arrives at the left side of the heart—the left atrium and ventricle. With each heartbeat, the bolus is propelled into the aorta, the body’s arterial highway. Endothelial transfection continues along the aortic wall, where high pressure and flow amplify LNP exposure. From the aorta, the bolus branches into systemic arteries, reaching organs like the brain, liver, spleen, and kidneys. Each organ’s vascular bed, rich with endothelium, becomes a transfection hotspot—upstream organs hit hardest due to the bolus’s initial density.
Transfected endothelial cells express antigens, inviting T-cell destruction, coagulation, and inflammation—damage scaling with bolus concentration and organ exposure. The Bolus Theory thus frames vaccine harm as a vascular cascade, driven by physics and pharmacokinetics from injection to systemic spread.
There's another side of Bolus Theory around stem cell contamination leading to cancer not addressed herein.
Early March 2025, an interesting study by two Japanese doctors was published1. Doctors Koizumi and Ono had autopsied three deceased patients—two females aged 75 and 91, one male aged 73—who suffered cardiac arrest. These elderly had received up to 6 Covid vaccine injections.
What did they find?
They found multiple micro-scars at the surface of the heart chambers, evenly distributed, but not in other organs;
The micro-scars were more numerous on the Left-side of the heart (64) than on the Right-side (only 1 to 5 hits);
The micro-scars were denser in the inner parts of the ventricles, notably on the septum.
They also found crushed red blood cells stuck in heart capillaries (thrombotic microangiopathy -TMA)
Let me try to decipher this for you with a Bolus Theory perspective.
1 - The Hallmark of Disseminated Endothelial Damage
(Mechanism of Harm #7 in “The Needle’s Secret”)
Microscopic analysis identified evenly distributed micro-scars (average diameter 0,2mm, spaced 0,4 mm apart) across the left and right ventricles, atrium, and pulmonary vein-left atrium junction.
In my book “The Needle’s Secret”, I call this a sieve-like topology (topology scenario #4 the most fragmented - see graphic from “The Needle’s Secret”). Small holes were likely poked by T-cells on the walls of the heart chambers following small clusters of vaccine nanoparticles hitting the sides of the heart chambers as they were pushed by blood flow. Here given the size of the scars, we are talking groups of one hundred particles packed together.
This is symptomatic of either a small concentration bolus or of particles not being activated yet in a larger bolus, possibly both. Without a more precise audit of the arterial walls downstream from the heart, it is impossible to give a definitive answer.
The low endothelial surface/volume ratios inside the heart are mathematically protective because a larger part of the bolus is unexposed to the linings.
Nonetheless, many more particles have had to hit these walls and transfected. But as discrete individual hits, they were likely replaced without scarring. It’s the concentration in space and time of the destruction that justifies the scarring.
2 - Left-Side Hits Indicative of Activation in the Lungs
Dr. Koizumi and Dr. Ono observed that there are more micro-scars on the Left side of the heart than on the Right. This is consistent with post-Covid-Vaccine adverse reactions where harm seems more often located in the Left side (1767 in VAERS) than on the Right side (603). The 1-to-3 difference between the right and left side is indicative more of a physical pathological process than a biological or genetic one.
Scarring happens when an epithelial surface is flayed, and repair is uneven. In other words, hundreds of cells were destroyed quasi-simultaneously, and patchwork repair is visible.
Since the bolus of particles is rapidly diluting into the bloodstream, one would expect upstream hits with high concentrations to be more intense. It’s quite obvious that - if lipid nanoparticles are responsible, they would be more concentrated arriving directly from the injection site, than after circulating through the Right heart chambers and the lungs…
This conundrum can be explained by the presence of the PEG coating intended to avoid LNP aggregation inside the vials. If PEG avoids lipid-to-lipid aggregation inside the vials, it would also avoid LNP-to-cell integration until it is eroded off most likely by the physical friction within the blood flow.
Once again, this is congruent with the Bolus Theory. Without PEG protection, the lungs would systematically be harmed, just like they are harmed by a bee sting2 in a veinule. The bee’s toxic toxins reach the lungs’ capillaries highly concentrated, and if the victim isn’t near a hospital he/she dies within 5 minutes.
Some scenarios harm the lungs, for example, if the injection goes into an arteriole, the journey, and then into the furthest pulmonary node, the probability would be greater for earlier activation. The longer the journey, the greater the activation. This is what likely happened to my two friends, Laurent and Gilles, who each lost an entire pulmonary node.
In this perspective, the left chambers and the aorta are in the worst of positions, as I wrote previously When the LNPs are activated enough and still not fully diluted (the top of the above curve), that’s when the window is dangerous.
There’s a Danger Curve that integrates the protection effect of PEG (100% protection at the start) and the dangerous effect of high concentration (highest transfection potential at the start). As the protection diminishes, activating more and more particles, the concentration diminishes making the vaccine particles less and less dangerous.
Let me try an analogy to make the concept simpler. It’s as if you were wearing a very effective body armor (the PEG) and someone was shooting at you a considerable amount of bullets (the bolus), as time goes on, the armor starts wearing off (the PEG erodes, and LNPS tranfect), and simultaneously the amount of bullets shot decreases (the concentration drops as the LNPs dilute). The armor weakens, but the fire rate decreases. At the start, not one bullet passes, no harm. Then armor weakens, so an occasional goes through. The peak harm happens when the maximum number of bullets shot passes despite the protection. Then the shots become less and less numerous, despite the weaknesses in the armor, until the point when there are no more shots fried and no harm happens.
For the record, 64 scars x 0,14 sq.mm. represents fewer than ten thousand LNPs clustered together, that’s only 0.00001% of the Pfizer dose!
Given what I know now, that all IM injections go IV, I would expect that to be a general case, especially after 5 or 6 Covid-vaccinations! Either these folks got injected very slowly (and flattened that danger curve 😉 ), or the heart chamber dynamics selected by evolution protect the walls from the bolus (that would makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint), or this is anecdotal because after 6 shots I would have expected many more scars than that, especially in view of the considerable damage found with white-clots, and the systematic leaks in the brain3.
3 - Scarring Density Explains the Role of Pressure in Transfection and Harm
When talking about transfection i.e. the fusion of a vaccine particle and a healthy cell, the research community has (once again) completely ignored the significance of physics, and notably physical momentum (speed) in transfection effectiveness. But, what better way to fuse two lipid-made elements than to physically throw one onto the other?
That’s also true for viruses, by the way. Viruses might need a spike protein hook-up on the outside in your nose, because there’s limited velocity to help fuse the virions with mucosal cells at the entry point, but once inside the bloodstream, physics takes over. Virions, just like vaccine particles, are projected against the walls of the vascular system by the blood flow and will penetrate and contaminate those cells, which will then be targeted for destruction by the immune system.
In today’s study, it’s telling to see that the inner side of the heart is significantly and systematically more transfected than the opposing side (the pushing side).
Here’s what Grok had to say:
…Perfectly aligns with Bolus Theory.
BTW: The same dynamics explain smooth muscle cell layer erosion ( Mechanism of Harm #2), aneurysms and aortic dissections, when the endothelial surface has been stripped.
4 - What About the Crushed Red Blood Cells Stuck in Heart Capillaries?
Frankly, it’s hard to tell. It’s too far after the vaccination dates to be directly tied to vaccine-induced thrombotic events. Their test demonstrates and confirms that.
Here, I would propose an educated conjecture, but a conjecture nonetheless. The data provided is clearly insufficient.
The crushed red blood cell is a recent event. So were arrhythmias and atrial and venticular fibrilations. One possibility would be that some heart capillaries are starting to clog because of white clots. I would have expected that to occur faster, but this is Japan, and both their nutrition is very healthy, and the use of Natto could explain delayed clogging. Microscopic white clots clogging over time in the heart could also explain the cardiac dysfunctions as well as the deaths of the three people.
Might well be they died of other consequences. One needs to remain honest and open.
The only certainty is a bolus of toxic particles was projected on the walls of these elderly’s hearts, and that requires an injection… The toxicity increased from one side of the heart to the other side, in line with PEG erosion. In other words, this was most likely triggered by a medical intervention, probably the COVID vaccine or other vaccines.
Frankly, it’s encouraging to see how “lightly” the hearts were scarred versus 5 or 6 injections of COVID vaccines. This is very much aligned with the general case of very small leaks in the brain which can heal. This calls for some degree of optimism on my part.
I hope you’ve enjoyed the take-aways of this analysis. The Bolus Theory is uncontested and unfalsified in four years now. Every new study confirms and strengthens it. Feel free to reach out for questions.
Don’t hesitate to become a paid-subscriber or even a Founding member. Hard to believe I have been working pro-bono five years. I hope the Bolus Theory finally gets accepted by the world as its impact could be formidable to help our friends, our families, and for the world in general. If you can help me support my family that would be extremely appreciated.
Love, Marc
Don’t hesitate to share about “The Needle’s Secret” around you.
My identifier on PayPal is marc.girardot@icloud.com
On a positive note, kittens have arrived… and they are beautiful.